Skip to main content
Photography

Return to Answer

replaced http://meta.photo.stackexchange.com/ with https://photo.meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

"Finally, a photography Q&A site that works."

This was actually proposed by JinJin, and it kind of cuts right to the point. Our site get you expert answers, with proof that they're good answers. It's a provocative statement that I think would get people to click ("Who are these people making this claim? Are they actually better?").

"Finally, a photography Q&A site that works."

This was actually proposed by Jin, and it kind of cuts right to the point. Our site get you expert answers, with proof that they're good answers. It's a provocative statement that I think would get people to click ("Who are these people making this claim? Are they actually better?").

"Finally, a photography Q&A site that works."

This was actually proposed by Jin, and it kind of cuts right to the point. Our site get you expert answers, with proof that they're good answers. It's a provocative statement that I think would get people to click ("Who are these people making this claim? Are they actually better?").

Source Link
Laura
Laura
  • 607
  • 3
  • 18

"Finally, a photography Q&A site that works."

This was actually proposed by Jin, and it kind of cuts right to the point. Our site get you expert answers, with proof that they're good answers. It's a provocative statement that I think would get people to click ("Who are these people making this claim? Are they actually better?").