Skip to main content
replaced http://meta.photo.stackexchange.com/ with https://photo.meta.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

If your question is very close or essentially the same, and the answers aren't good, either edit it to increase clarity or offer a bounty (which may not workmay not work but is worth a try).

If your question is a twist on or a followup to the earlier question, ask a new one and link to the old onenew one and link to the old one as part of your question.

If the existing question is general but you have a specific case not covered by existing answers, offer a bounty for improved answers which cover that case too. Or, if there's a good reason the special case should be considered separately from the general — either your case is too weird, or else the general is too general — then a followup question is appropriate.

In the other direction, if the existing question is very specific and you want to generalize, I suggest looking at the existing answers. If they are steering very strongly towards the general (because the question reasonably was made more specific than necessary, like asking for brand-specific solutions to non-brand-specific problems), then editing the question to also be more general might be okay (used with caution). If the question is specific and the answers are correspondingly targetted, a new question referencing the old one is definitely in order.

If your question is very close or essentially the same, and the answers aren't good, either edit it to increase clarity or offer a bounty (which may not work but is worth a try).

If your question is a twist on or a followup to the earlier question, ask a new one and link to the old one as part of your question.

If the existing question is general but you have a specific case not covered by existing answers, offer a bounty for improved answers which cover that case too. Or, if there's a good reason the special case should be considered separately from the general — either your case is too weird, or else the general is too general — then a followup question is appropriate.

In the other direction, if the existing question is very specific and you want to generalize, I suggest looking at the existing answers. If they are steering very strongly towards the general (because the question reasonably was made more specific than necessary, like asking for brand-specific solutions to non-brand-specific problems), then editing the question to also be more general might be okay (used with caution). If the question is specific and the answers are correspondingly targetted, a new question referencing the old one is definitely in order.

If your question is very close or essentially the same, and the answers aren't good, either edit it to increase clarity or offer a bounty (which may not work but is worth a try).

If your question is a twist on or a followup to the earlier question, ask a new one and link to the old one as part of your question.

If the existing question is general but you have a specific case not covered by existing answers, offer a bounty for improved answers which cover that case too. Or, if there's a good reason the special case should be considered separately from the general — either your case is too weird, or else the general is too general — then a followup question is appropriate.

In the other direction, if the existing question is very specific and you want to generalize, I suggest looking at the existing answers. If they are steering very strongly towards the general (because the question reasonably was made more specific than necessary, like asking for brand-specific solutions to non-brand-specific problems), then editing the question to also be more general might be okay (used with caution). If the question is specific and the answers are correspondingly targetted, a new question referencing the old one is definitely in order.

added 147 characters in body
Source Link
mattdm
  • 143.6k
  • 3
  • 44
  • 72

If your question is very close or essentially the same, and the answers aren't good, either edit it to increase clarity or offer a bounty (which may not work but is worth a try).

If your question is a twist on or a followup to the earlier question, ask a new one and link to the old one as part of your question.

If the existing question is general but you have a specific case not covered by existing answers, offer a bounty for improved answers which cover that case too. Or, if there's a good reason the special case should be considered separately from the general — either your case is too weird, or else the general is too general — then a followup question is appropriate.

In the other direction, if the existing question is very specific and you want to generalize, I suggest looking at the existing answers. If they are steering very strongly towards the general (because the question reasonably was made more specific than necessary, like asking for brand-specific solutions to non-brand-specific problems), then editing the question to also be more general might be okay (used with caution). If the question is specific and the answers are correspondingly targetted, a new quesitonquestion referencing the old one is definitely in order.

If your question is very close or essentially the same, and the answers aren't good, either edit it to increase clarity or offer a bounty (which may not work but is worth a try).

If your question is a twist on or a followup to the earlier question, ask a new one and link to the old one as part of your question.

If the existing question is general but you have a specific case not covered by existing answers, offer a bounty for improved answers which cover that case too. Or, if there's a good reason the special case should be considered separately from the general — either your case is too weird, or else the general is too general — then a followup question is appropriate.

In the other direction, if the existing question is very specific and you want to generalize, I suggest looking at the existing answers. If they are steering very strongly towards the general, then editing the question to also be more general might be okay (used with caution). If the question is specific and the answers are correspondingly targetted, a new quesiton referencing the old one is definitely in order.

If your question is very close or essentially the same, and the answers aren't good, either edit it to increase clarity or offer a bounty (which may not work but is worth a try).

If your question is a twist on or a followup to the earlier question, ask a new one and link to the old one as part of your question.

If the existing question is general but you have a specific case not covered by existing answers, offer a bounty for improved answers which cover that case too. Or, if there's a good reason the special case should be considered separately from the general — either your case is too weird, or else the general is too general — then a followup question is appropriate.

In the other direction, if the existing question is very specific and you want to generalize, I suggest looking at the existing answers. If they are steering very strongly towards the general (because the question reasonably was made more specific than necessary, like asking for brand-specific solutions to non-brand-specific problems), then editing the question to also be more general might be okay (used with caution). If the question is specific and the answers are correspondingly targetted, a new question referencing the old one is definitely in order.

added 795 characters in body
Source Link
mattdm
  • 143.6k
  • 3
  • 44
  • 72

If your question is very close or essentially the same, and the answers aren't good, either edit it to increase clarity or offer a bounty (which may not work but is worth a try).

If your question is a twist on or a followup to the earlier question, ask a new one and link to the old one as part of your question.

If the existing question is general but you have a specific case not covered by existing answers, offer a bounty for improved answers which cover that case too. Or, if there's a good reason the special case should be considered separately from the general — either your case is too weird, or else the general is too general — then a followup question is appropriate.

In the other direction, if the existing question is very specific and you want to generalize, I suggest looking at the existing answers. If they are steering very strongly towards the general, then editing the question to also be more general might be okay (used with caution). If the question is specific and the answers are correspondingly targetted, a new quesiton referencing the old one is definitely in order.

If your question is very close or essentially the same, and the answers aren't good, either edit it to increase clarity or offer a bounty (which may not work but is worth a try).

If your question is a twist on or a followup to the earlier question, ask a new one and link to the old one as part of your question.

If your question is very close or essentially the same, and the answers aren't good, either edit it to increase clarity or offer a bounty (which may not work but is worth a try).

If your question is a twist on or a followup to the earlier question, ask a new one and link to the old one as part of your question.

If the existing question is general but you have a specific case not covered by existing answers, offer a bounty for improved answers which cover that case too. Or, if there's a good reason the special case should be considered separately from the general — either your case is too weird, or else the general is too general — then a followup question is appropriate.

In the other direction, if the existing question is very specific and you want to generalize, I suggest looking at the existing answers. If they are steering very strongly towards the general, then editing the question to also be more general might be okay (used with caution). If the question is specific and the answers are correspondingly targetted, a new quesiton referencing the old one is definitely in order.

Source Link
mattdm
  • 143.6k
  • 3
  • 44
  • 72
Loading