Timeline for Off-topic Close Reasons
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 20, 2017 at 10:32 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Mar 16, 2017 at 15:44 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.photo.stackexchange.com/ with https://photo.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Apr 23, 2014 at 13:34 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Fixup of bad MSO links to MSE links migration
|
|
Apr 23, 2014 at 9:14 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Migration of MSO links to MSE links
|
|
Oct 31, 2013 at 15:00 | comment | added | Joanne C Mod | Yep. Appears that I can still edit until it's gone live. | |
Oct 31, 2013 at 14:57 | comment | added | mattdm | I hope you fixed my missing word "is". :) | |
Oct 31, 2013 at 12:40 | comment | added | Joanne C Mod | Oddly enough, you can't modify the reason after the fact... So, I created a new video one matching your model (as it is the recommended structure), but putting one up requires two moderators to do. I guess they want two fingers on the big red button... :) | |
Oct 31, 2013 at 12:37 | comment | added | mattdm | I would also like to see something like "and are often more dependent on personal preference than objective expert knowledge" added to the "obsolete quickly" note in the product recommendation close reason.... | |
Oct 31, 2013 at 12:34 | comment | added | mattdm | That would make me happy. :) See suggested text below.... | |
Oct 31, 2013 at 12:34 | comment | added | Joanne C Mod | @mattdm - Not that I know of... I can turn it back on. | |
Oct 31, 2013 at 12:29 | comment | added | mattdm | Was the off-topic reason about videography banned by SE for some reason, or could we put it back? | |
Oct 16, 2013 at 17:56 | answer | added | mattdm | timeline score: 1 | |
Oct 16, 2013 at 13:39 | answer | added | Håkon K. Olafsen | timeline score: 0 | |
Sep 25, 2013 at 18:34 | comment | added | Joanne C Mod | No, not that I know of. This is intended to be frequently encountered reasons. | |
Sep 25, 2013 at 18:22 | comment | added | Håkon K. Olafsen | Is it possible to have a "off topic" with custom reason? | |
Sep 24, 2013 at 15:50 | history | asked | Joanne CMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |