Timeline for Can we modify the "shopping" close reason to include more than just "out-of-date quickly"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
25 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 16, 2017 at 15:44 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.photo.stackexchange.com/ with https://photo.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Feb 28, 2015 at 3:07 | history | edited | Joanne CMod |
edited tags
|
|
Feb 28, 2015 at 1:02 | comment | added | Joanne C Mod | @abbyhairboat - Thanks so much! | |
Feb 28, 2015 at 1:01 | comment | added | hairboat StaffMod | @JoanneC: Done! | |
Feb 28, 2015 at 0:46 | comment | added | Joanne C Mod | @abbyhairboat - Any chance one of you kind folks at HQ would consider approving the change to the custom close reason? I'm the only really active mod it would seem and I can't do it alone. | |
Dec 31, 2014 at 4:14 | comment | added | Joanne C Mod | @jrista - Just a ping on this one. | |
Dec 31, 2014 at 4:13 | comment | added | Joanne C Mod | @dpollitt - I've made the change, but the system requires one other mod to agree with me before it can be activated. | |
Dec 31, 2014 at 3:55 | comment | added | dpollitt | JoanneC: Either your proposed update or Matts I think would be great. I'm not a mod, but I think I could for 100(ish)% if I do say so myself :-P | |
Dec 12, 2014 at 20:49 | comment | added | Joanne C Mod | I haven't deactivated the old one for the time being, otherwise it gets removed from the close dialog. So, once the new one is good, one of us can deactivate the old one. | |
Dec 12, 2014 at 20:44 | comment | added | Joanne C Mod | I'm going to update. @jrista - Next visit in, could you have a look. | |
Dec 12, 2014 at 20:43 | comment | added | mattdm | FWIW, I'm for it. | |
Dec 12, 2014 at 20:42 | comment | added | Joanne C Mod | The question now, I suppose, is there any reason I shouldn't make the adjustment I proposed? Obviously another moderator needs to approve. | |
Dec 4, 2014 at 15:21 | answer | added | Joanne CMod | timeline score: 3 | |
Dec 4, 2014 at 14:34 | answer | added | AJ HendersonMod | timeline score: -2 | |
Dec 3, 2014 at 11:24 | comment | added | Joanne C Mod | @abbyhairboat - Will do. There hasn't been a lot of feedback, sadly. I might need to nudge some in chat. | |
Dec 3, 2014 at 6:58 | comment | added | hairboat StaffMod | JoanneC: - shoot me an email when you're 100(ish)% sure what the community wants this changed to, and I'll see about it. | |
Dec 1, 2014 at 22:09 | answer | added | mattdm | timeline score: 2 | |
Dec 1, 2014 at 21:42 | comment | added | Joanne C Mod | Hehe, yeah, I agree, we'll definitely do an update this week I think. | |
Dec 1, 2014 at 21:40 | comment | added | mattdm | JoanneC: Definitely open to other suggestions. The Serverfault one seems pretty good to me but is missing the key point I want to get in there, which I often repeat in comments: "If this question had a general answer, there wouldn't be so many cameras and lenses on the market." | |
Dec 1, 2014 at 21:39 | comment | added | Joanne C Mod | As a side note, we have about 350 characters for close reasons. | |
Dec 1, 2014 at 21:37 | comment | added | Joanne C Mod | I'm in favor of an improvement, though I'm not entirely sure with your suggestions as they don't seem quite right to me, though I'm struggling to put my finger on why I feel that way. Mind you, it's not to say I have a better idea at the moment, so unless someone else has an epiphany near term... | |
Nov 30, 2014 at 16:23 | comment | added | mattdm | For what it's worth, the close reason on Serverfault is: "Requests for product, service, or learning material recommendations are off-topic because they attract low quality, opinionated and spam answers, and the answers become obsolete quickly. Instead, describe the business problem you are working on, the research you have done, and the steps taken so far to solve it.", linking to this and this. I think we get these questions even more than serverfault does — we should have an explanation at least as good. :) | |
Nov 29, 2014 at 2:35 | history | edited | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 94 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
Nov 29, 2014 at 2:30 | comment | added | mattdm | It's my understanding that this modification requires involvement beyond what mods can do, based on this comment. So, I guess this is a request for Stack Exchange staff. | |
Nov 28, 2014 at 21:58 | history | asked | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |