Timeline for How can we do photo critiques?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2011 at 19:08 | comment | added | D. Lambert | Thanks - that's helpful. | |
| Feb 25, 2011 at 18:40 | comment | added | chills42 Mod | True, it is reliant on having a good attendance, but we keep record of the past events, so you can go back and take a look: chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/info/14/… | |
| Feb 25, 2011 at 18:03 | comment | added | D. Lambert | True. I see there's a photo critique session currently scheduled to occur five days from now, on Mar 2, though I'm afraid I can't see the time it's scheduled to start. If you've participated in one of these sessions, I'd like to hear your assessment of how it went. My initial concern is that the interaction seems pretty transient (ie, you can get good feedback from people who are available at that time, but you'd miss out on those who aren't). | |
| Feb 25, 2011 at 17:50 | comment | added | chills42 Mod | We have discussed (and even tried out) critiques in chat: meta.photo.stackexchange.com/questions/461/… | |
| Feb 25, 2011 at 16:27 | answer | added | ahockley | timeline score: 5 | |
| Feb 25, 2011 at 15:46 | comment | added | D. Lambert | So, just to be clear, whenever someone posts a photo right now (as on this question: photo.stackexchange.com/questions/2627/…), they're subject to the CC ShareAlike license. It also seems like critiques might fall under the "fair use" provision of CC. I'm on pretty shaky ground here, though, so if there's a lawyer in the house, I'd love to have a little dose of wisdom. | |
| Feb 25, 2011 at 15:30 | comment | added | D. Lambert | Ok, I agree that's something that would have to be understood. Since the CC license is non-exclusive, would our exposure be limited to CC-compatible reuse of whatever images we post here? I imagine that in most cases, we're going to post small-scale versions of our photos -- possibly watermarked as well. As @drewbenn indicated, if there isn't a better way to handle this, maybe that's just part of the price of admission. | |
| Feb 25, 2011 at 15:14 | answer | added | labnut | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 25, 2011 at 14:02 | comment | added | mattdm | That's the issue, yes. That's a pretty high price to pay, since while I'm very in favor of open culture and sharing, I don't think the CC licenses are well-suited to photography. | |
| Feb 25, 2011 at 7:31 | comment | added | user2910 | @mattdm What exactly is the license issue? I assume you're talking about the "anything uploaded to Photo-SE gets a CC license" issue; if so, couldn't "if you want a photo critiqued, you have to give it a CC license" be part of the 'price' of the critique? Or are you talking about a different issue (and do you have a link? A search on Meta for 'license issue' only turned up questions about CC)? | |
| Feb 25, 2011 at 5:13 | comment | added | mattdm | The license issue would need to be resolved. | |
| Feb 24, 2011 at 23:05 | answer | added | D. Lambert | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 24, 2011 at 21:14 | answer | added | Jeff Atwood | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 24, 2011 at 17:13 | history | asked | D. Lambert | CC BY-SA 2.5 |