Timeline for How can we do photo critiques?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2011 at 2:51 | comment | added | D. Lambert | Honestly, that's even better as far as I'm concerned. On other sites, I've seen critique requests require specific feedback areas. In part, I believe this is to cut down on vacuous comments, but if we let people vote down flip or superficial answers, I think this would be somewhat self-regulating. | |
| Feb 26, 2011 at 0:35 | comment | added | Jay Lance Photography | Actually none of the examples given here are critiques... At best they're requests for feedback. A true critique (by definition) would include only a picture from the person requesting the critique with no commentary or question, and the feedback would be in no way 'steered' by the person who took the photograph. (The potential to 'steer' the critique is generally why the person being critiqued is not allowed to comment or preface his or her work prior to the critique). | |
| Feb 25, 2011 at 5:12 | comment | added | mattdm | @Jeff Atwood: but he's got the technique down just fine. And the question wasn't "how does it make you feel". | |
| Feb 25, 2011 at 0:30 | comment | added | Jeff Atwood | interesting, to me this should be about the technique of capturing the embossed logo, and not so much "how does this embossed logo make you feel" | |
| Feb 24, 2011 at 23:05 | history | answered | D. Lambert | CC BY-SA 2.5 |