3

I've been going through tags today, and I came across the tag. Is this tag really valuable? It seems rather redundant, and I think it runs the high risk of becoming overused and rather useless. Just about every question on this site so far could be tagged with , as the vast bulk of our questions are camera related, with the minority falling into the post-processing and printing categories.

||||||
5

Seems redundant to me.

||||||
3

Yeah, I'm for killing it. In some cases, might be appropriate, and often is.

I went through and removed the tag from all existing questions. Now it is dead.

||||||
  • Lazy New Year's Day? Good stuff :-) It doesn't seem to be quite dead yet though - see e.g. the [camera] Top Users page. That may be some of SE's aggressive caching waiting to rebuild though. – Philip Kendall Jan 1 '14 at 20:24
  • That page has gone now, so I'm guessing it was just caching. – Philip Kendall Jan 3 '14 at 15:14
1

Bump :-)

I just found this tag today and came to pretty much the same conclusion: it's not going to add any value as de facto all our questions relate to a camera in one way or another. I'd suggest we delete the tag, but is there anything we can do to stop it coming back again?

||||||

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for?Browse other questions tagged .