2

The tag is usually used by beginners to tag their questions, even if they're not actually about being a beginner in any way. If the questions really are basics, we have and , which I think are okay if used sparingly. But I think really serves no purpose.

There are 75 questions so tagged, so going through by hand is a little tedious. Can a mod nuke it?

7
  • I wouldn't mind seeing a little bit of weighing in from the community first. Otherwise, I'm okay with it. :) – John Cavan Nov 19 '15 at 2:34
  • Okay. I added two possibilies to vote up or down. – mattdm Nov 19 '15 at 15:02
  • Unless we get a flurry of "No" votes, I'll kill it on Monday at some point. – John Cavan Nov 22 '15 at 20:15
  • Apparently I can't kill it... I can only merge it into another. A request for this ability has been hanging around since at least 2013, if not longer. – John Cavan Nov 28 '15 at 20:42
  • I'd merge it into photography basics, but I'm not convinced all should be. That would make the synonym feature kick in though, which would stop further use. – John Cavan Nov 28 '15 at 20:45
  • @JohnCavan Want to merge it into [hotography-basics? I can go through those (slowly) and remove it where it's not appropriate – mattdm May 6 '16 at 17:52
  • All done, the tags are merged. – John Cavan May 6 '16 at 21:04
5

Yes. This serves no real purpose and should be removed.

1
  • 1
    I agree. New users love to point to the existence of tags for allowing off topic questions, and this is a great example of that. i.e. "but you have a video tag so my question about buying a video camera..." Beginner itself really tells us nothing useful about a question because everyone starts at a different place. Theres no reason for an "expert" tag so why have a beginner tag? +1 – dpollitt Nov 21 '15 at 20:53
0

No, let's leave it. We could potentially have a useful collection of questions about beginners.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .