4
\$\begingroup\$

This is the place to submit and vote on photos for the week of Dec 13 to be featured on the main site. Rules:

  • Limit one photo per person per week.
  • A specific photo may be submitted at most two weeks in a row, and not more than four times a year.
  • Keep all images appropriate, we want this site to be work safe.
  • Do not submit a photo if you are currently featured.
  • Images should be 375 x 210 px.

Last Week's Thread

\$\endgroup\$

7 Answers 7

Reset to default
16
\$\begingroup\$

arches

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • \$\begingroup\$ from this set on flik: flickr.com/photos/uberto/sets/72157623802861979 \$\endgroup\$
    – uberto
    Dec 8, 2010 at 10:01
  • \$\begingroup\$ what's the title for this photo? Is it ok if I use "Andalusia" from your Flickr set for the site header? \$\endgroup\$
    – Jin
    Dec 13, 2010 at 6:02
  • \$\begingroup\$ @tim: yes it sounds good \$\endgroup\$
    – uberto
    Dec 13, 2010 at 10:13
13
\$\begingroup\$

alt text

I took this one a few days ago. An anonymous couple, on the streets of Saratoga Springs, NY. Here is the original, large on black with the correct aspect ratio.

\$\endgroup\$
5
  • \$\begingroup\$ I think I actually prefer it with this aspect ratio - gives a very cinematic feel. \$\endgroup\$
    – Rowland Shaw
    Dec 7, 2010 at 18:45
  • \$\begingroup\$ Hmm, brings up an interesting question in my mind. Does the banner page for this site count as "commercial use"? I wonder if they'd have a publicity rights claim or anything. (I presume you don't have a release, given your statement that they're "Anonymous". I don't know if it matters or not, just raising the question.) \$\endgroup\$
    – lindes
    Dec 7, 2010 at 21:21
  • \$\begingroup\$ I don't see photo.se as "commercial use", the same way another community site like Wikipedia isn't. On the other hand that's one of the reason I posted this one, I think so far we have stayed away from portraits or people, maybe for legal reasons. Said couple was anonymous when I shot them, but they found me online after the pics made the rounds locally. They were really happy with the pic and I sent them the original. I'm pretty confident they would allow us to use it as a banner for a week. \$\endgroup\$
    – sebastien.b
    Dec 7, 2010 at 23:05
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @sebastian.b Wikipedia requires images to be suitable for commercial use though, if I remember correctly. \$\endgroup\$
    – Rowland Shaw
    Dec 10, 2010 at 20:39
  • \$\begingroup\$ +1 for people. We've had enough pictures of static objects lately. \$\endgroup\$
    – Evan Krall
    Dec 12, 2010 at 23:40
9
\$\begingroup\$

Haven't submitted before... gonna give this thing a shot, and just see what comes of it. Trying out an abstract -- kinetic camera capture:

kinesis

(This is a crop from Kinesis, on flickr.)

\$\endgroup\$
8
\$\begingroup\$

alt text

Carnival Rainbow

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ I love the depth in here. I wonder how this will look in 3d \$\endgroup\$
    – Midhat
    Dec 9, 2010 at 8:59
6
\$\begingroup\$

alt text

Sunset on the Orwell

\$\endgroup\$
4
\$\begingroup\$

alt text

\$\endgroup\$
4
\$\begingroup\$

Reflections in a sculpture at Chatsworth House, Peak District, UK.

alt text

\$\endgroup\$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .