Skip to main content
Photography

Return to Answer

replaced http://photo.stackexchange.com/ with https://photo.stackexchange.com/
Source Link
Community Bot
Community Bot
  • 1

Theoretically, the site will become prestigious enough that in time, it may just get sent review copies (along with associated press embargoes); Until then, it may be a good use of company funds (even if they become loot for other SE sites - you could imagine the tag line -- "win this [compact camera] that the guys over at http://photo.stackexchange.com/https://photo.stackexchange.com/ said was going to revolutionise photography.")

I feel that there would be sufficient interest, both on a readership side and on the authoring side. On the authoring side, and if SE Inc. do purchase the review equipment, I would expect them to have a vetting/auditioning process of their own.

There would be good scope to review other things; maybe regional printing firms for handling gliceé printing. The reviews would sit well amongst articles that could sum up a visit to some of the big trade shows as well.

Theoretically, the site will become prestigious enough that in time, it may just get sent review copies (along with associated press embargoes); Until then, it may be a good use of company funds (even if they become loot for other SE sites - you could imagine the tag line -- "win this [compact camera] that the guys over at http://photo.stackexchange.com/ said was going to revolutionise photography.")

I feel that there would be sufficient interest, both on a readership side and on the authoring side. On the authoring side, and if SE Inc. do purchase the review equipment, I would expect them to have a vetting/auditioning process of their own.

There would be good scope to review other things; maybe regional printing firms for handling gliceé printing. The reviews would sit well amongst articles that could sum up a visit to some of the big trade shows as well.

Theoretically, the site will become prestigious enough that in time, it may just get sent review copies (along with associated press embargoes); Until then, it may be a good use of company funds (even if they become loot for other SE sites - you could imagine the tag line -- "win this [compact camera] that the guys over at https://photo.stackexchange.com/ said was going to revolutionise photography.")

I feel that there would be sufficient interest, both on a readership side and on the authoring side. On the authoring side, and if SE Inc. do purchase the review equipment, I would expect them to have a vetting/auditioning process of their own.

There would be good scope to review other things; maybe regional printing firms for handling gliceé printing. The reviews would sit well amongst articles that could sum up a visit to some of the big trade shows as well.

Source Link
Rowland Shaw Mod
Rowland Shaw Mod
  • 16.1k
  • 19
  • 28

Theoretically, the site will become prestigious enough that in time, it may just get sent review copies (along with associated press embargoes); Until then, it may be a good use of company funds (even if they become loot for other SE sites - you could imagine the tag line -- "win this [compact camera] that the guys over at http://photo.stackexchange.com/ said was going to revolutionise photography.")

I feel that there would be sufficient interest, both on a readership side and on the authoring side. On the authoring side, and if SE Inc. do purchase the review equipment, I would expect them to have a vetting/auditioning process of their own.

There would be good scope to review other things; maybe regional printing firms for handling gliceé printing. The reviews would sit well amongst articles that could sum up a visit to some of the big trade shows as well.