Timeline for Should Photo Critiques be allowed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2010 at 6:00 | vote | accept | Alan | ||
| Jul 27, 2010 at 23:14 | comment | added | ex-ms | Just to test it out/be the devil's advocate, where would this FAQ text put questions like: "I tried to emulate X by doing Y, do you think I was successful?" vs "I tried to emulate X by doing Y, why do you think it didn't work?" | |
| Jul 25, 2010 at 23:46 | history | edited | Reid | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Jul 25, 2010 at 23:45 | comment | added | Reid | I like it. I took the liberty of editing; feel free to revert if you disagree. | |
| Jul 25, 2010 at 20:31 | comment | added | Edd |
@Fredrik Mörk: At present we're generally tagging questions that discuss FAQ matters with [faq-suggestion], as explained here: meta.photo.stackexchange.com/questions/11/…
|
|
| Jul 25, 2010 at 18:46 | comment | added | Fredrik Mörk | @Reid and @Rowland: I have update the answer with a suggested FAQ text on the matter. I guess there should be specific faq posts created by I am a bit unsure about the process. | |
| Jul 25, 2010 at 18:44 | history | edited | Fredrik Mörk | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 600 characters in body
|
| Jul 25, 2010 at 7:57 | comment | added | Rowland Shaw | ...and during the definition phase, it was considered that questions like "why is this so horribly overexposed in this corner yet underexposed to the left" would be acceptable (per Fredrik's link). That's not inconsistent with what you'd suggested. | |
| Jul 25, 2010 at 1:33 | comment | added | Reid | Probably there's a FAQ answer to be written here to define exactly what critique means, as the form I suggested could be interpreted as a critique but is getting a fair amount of upvotes. | |
| Jul 24, 2010 at 22:04 | history | answered | Fredrik Mörk | CC BY-SA 2.5 |