Timeline for Speculation into trends: yes or no?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:44 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://photo.stackexchange.com/ with https://photo.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jan 11, 2012 at 12:39 | comment | added | Rowland Shaw Mod | Additionally, community wiki is not a way to save a subjective question from closure/deletion; it can only be granted by a mod IIRC too. | |
| Jan 9, 2012 at 13:43 | answer | added | mattdm | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 9, 2012 at 13:40 | answer | added | mattdm | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jan 9, 2012 at 13:38 | answer | added | Rowland ShawMod | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 9, 2012 at 13:37 | comment | added | mattdm | I'm going to go ahead and put forth two possibilities to vote for. And those I will mark community wiki. :) Feel free to edit each answer and add points for each side. | |
| Jan 9, 2012 at 13:35 | comment | added | mattdm | I have a strong belief that community wiki is the wrong choice for subjective questions, because ownership is an important component of a good subjective answer. I think these should either stay or be closed, but we should make a community decision and be consistent with it. | |
| Jan 9, 2012 at 13:23 | comment | added | ab.aditya | I did think quite a bit regarding the future speculation guideline before posting the question, but posted it to get answers on the factors going for the DSLR system, especially from the investment angle. I'm ok with the post being converted to a CW if there is a consensus, though @jrista's answer is quite comprehensive. | |
| Jan 9, 2012 at 12:16 | comment | added | forsvarir | I'd say it should be closed as 'not constructive', since any answers are entirely subjective, however didn't see much point flagging it as it's already been answered by a mod... | |
| Jan 9, 2012 at 11:40 | history | asked | mattdm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |