Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 15, 2014 at 21:25 comment added user22472 Does this post is any more actual? My questions about the quality of one camera compared to the other was closed: photo.stackexchange.com/questions/46918/…
Dec 16, 2010 at 17:01 comment added Shizam Hahah: photo.stackexchange.com/questions/5769/…
Dec 16, 2010 at 14:06 comment added mattdm @Shizam: those are actually still time-bound, although less so. What you can get (and therefore what you should look for) in a sub-$1000 dSLR is very different from what it was five years ago.
Dec 16, 2010 at 0:41 comment added Shizam @Reid & @jrista Sure, its all about context 'What is the best sub $1k DSLR' is a bad question, 'Tips on buying a sub $1k DSLR' or 'What to look for in a sub $1k DSLR' are great questions with answers that will still be valid years from now.
Dec 15, 2010 at 20:38 comment added jrista Mod @Reid: I think a question about buying a sub-1k DSLR can be a reasonable question, but wording is a factor. A lot of people just read the title, then spin off an answer. Questions with "What's the best blah blah" should always be examined, and at the very least, the title should be reworded to be less subjective and more targeted. I think as we continue to moderate, we can slowly educate our community as to what kinds of questions (and the wording used to ask them) will garner the most support and useful answers.
Dec 13, 2010 at 2:20 comment added Reid I think that "What's the best sub $1k DSLR" is a perfectly reasonable question given enough context in the question. Nearly all questions are at least somewhat subjective, and I believe that answers to this one are of value to photographers; hence, they should be on topic.
Dec 11, 2010 at 0:28 comment added BBischof I agree completely with this answer.
Dec 10, 2010 at 22:11 history answered Shizam CC BY-SA 2.5