Timeline for Counter-Proposal: Leave contest on meta. Add critiques to main site
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
38 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2019 at 0:01 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
|
|
| Apr 25, 2019 at 8:33 | history | edited | xiota | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
;;
|
| Apr 24, 2019 at 23:47 | comment | added | OnBreak. | edited a bit...that's a fact. 20x and counting... | |
| Apr 24, 2019 at 23:46 | answer | added | OnBreak. | timeline score: 5 | |
| Apr 24, 2019 at 22:57 | history | edited | OnBreak. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Apr 24, 2019 at 22:38 | comment | added | xiota | @Hueco Question has been edited a bit... Any thoughts, comments, suggestions? | |
| Apr 24, 2019 at 22:37 | comment | added | xiota | @mattdm Some recent questions might have made some good critique questions. Have started a list at end of post. Feel free to add if you're interested. | |
| Apr 24, 2019 at 22:36 | history | edited | xiota | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
;;
|
| Apr 24, 2019 at 22:31 | comment | added | xiota | @AJHenderson Revised so that a specific question or objective to guide critique is more strongly recommended. "What do you think of my photo?" is recommended to be closed as opinion based. "How can I improve my photo?" is recommended to be closed as too broad. | |
| Apr 24, 2019 at 22:30 | history | edited | xiota | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
;;
|
| Apr 24, 2019 at 15:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPhotos/status/1121066419100188673 | ||
| Apr 24, 2019 at 14:50 | comment | added | AJ Henderson Mod | Actually, thinking about it, that's an interesting thing about critique questions, too broad and primarily opinion based are extremely similar in this case. I suppose it doesn't really matter too much which one is used, but it's interesting that they are so closely related for this purpose. | |
| Apr 24, 2019 at 14:49 | comment | added | AJ Henderson Mod | Not sure I agree with the way it's currently phrased without adding something to the extent of "unless they are not asking for a clear goal in the critique. I think the critiques do need to be directed atleast somewhat so that answers can be good subjective. "What do you think of my photo?" is opinion based and not really able to be answered under good subjective. "What do you think of how this image captures the relationship between the subjects?" is answerable and gives direction so that answers, while opinion based, can provide support as to why they feel the image does or doesn't. | |
| Apr 24, 2019 at 13:05 | history | edited | xiota | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
;;
|
| Apr 24, 2019 at 12:46 | history | edited | AJ HendersonMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 24, 2019 at 12:45 | comment | added | AJ Henderson Mod | I would also say that for the opinion based close reason you should link good subjective/bad subjective. I'm on my phone at the moment and can't provide the actual link, but a Google search of good subjective bad subjective should find the se blog post on it. | |
| Apr 24, 2019 at 10:04 | history | edited | xiota | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
;;
|
| Apr 24, 2019 at 9:30 | history | edited | xiota | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
;;
|
| Apr 24, 2019 at 9:17 | history | edited | xiota | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
;;
|
| Apr 24, 2019 at 9:11 | comment | added | mattdm | The title should be distinct and descriptive — not just the date. I know that's hard, but it'll us find specific photos later (and be more interesting on hot network questions, etc.) | |
| Apr 24, 2019 at 9:10 | comment | added | mattdm | The photo should be inlined. We should keep the CC-BY-SA note from the contest. This isn't a general "show off my work" site, and this is a fair trade for people (also CC-BY-SA!) expertise. And it unambiguously allows modified versions in responses. | |
| Apr 24, 2019 at 9:07 | comment | added | mattdm | Either NSFW should use the spoiler narkdown or we should just not do it There are other venues. | |
| Apr 24, 2019 at 6:51 | history | edited | xiota | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
;;
|
| Apr 24, 2019 at 6:46 | history | edited | xiota | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
;;
|
| Apr 24, 2019 at 6:32 | history | edited | xiota | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
;;
|
| Apr 24, 2019 at 6:25 | history | edited | xiota | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
;;
|
| Apr 24, 2019 at 6:17 | history | edited | xiota | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
;;
|
| Apr 24, 2019 at 5:49 | history | edited | xiota | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
;;
|
| Apr 24, 2019 at 4:44 | comment | added | AJ Henderson Mod | Only things I would add is limit it to one photo unless it's a related series. The definition of related series would be based on the second thing, which is require that they be asking for a focused critique. By that, I mean there should be a specific thing they want feedback on, such as what works and doesn't towards accomplishing a particular goal (as an example). This lends itself towards both better discovery and more good subjective answers vs bad subjective answers. | |
| Apr 24, 2019 at 2:59 | history | edited | xiota | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
;;
|
| Apr 24, 2019 at 2:54 | history | edited | xiota | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
;;
|
| Apr 24, 2019 at 2:00 | history | edited | xiota | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
;;
|
| Apr 24, 2019 at 0:17 | answer | added | mattdm | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 23, 2019 at 22:16 | comment | added | OnBreak. | Obviously I'm not in direct agreement here as I do want to see the contest go to main...but putting that aside for a moment, this bullet point 'Photos, up to 3 (or 5?)' - I think is wrong. I don't think anyone wants questions like "please critique me as a photographer based on my portfolio" - they have little value to others. Critique this one photo where I am attempting to accomplish x is more helpful to others and also provides more value to the shooter. | |
| Apr 23, 2019 at 20:30 | history | edited | xiota | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
;;
|
| Apr 23, 2019 at 20:22 | history | edited | xiota | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
;;
|
| Apr 23, 2019 at 20:16 | history | edited | xiota | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
;;
|
| Apr 23, 2019 at 20:11 | history | asked | xiota | CC BY-SA 4.0 |