6
\$\begingroup\$

I'm pretty sure that and should be the same. There might have been a useful distinction in 2004 but I don't think there is in 2014.

I guess I have a slight preference for , but I don't really care which is the master.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Are we still at the same place now, 4 years later? I was about to ask this very question, then found yours. Can we move forward? \$\endgroup\$
    – Cullub
    Commented Aug 8, 2018 at 21:48

4 Answers 4

3
\$\begingroup\$

TL;DR: merge into . Let do the work for phone camera app software.

2 1/2 years on, the and tags are a mess. For the most part, there doesn't seem to be much distinction to the use of the tags.

  • There are 49 questions tagged smartphone, 58 tagged cameraphones, and 9 questions tagged with both.

  • Several questions use the word "smartphone", but are only tagged with .

  • Many questions use terms such as "mobile phone camera", "cellphone camera", or just "phone camera". They are tagged either way, with little distinction.

On a pedantic note, smartphone tag is singular, but cameraphones is plural. The inconsistency irks me.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yeah, we are very inconsistent with plural vs. not. There are too many to really clean up. \$\endgroup\$
    – mattdm
    Commented Jul 31, 2016 at 16:01
0
\$\begingroup\$

I'd like it if there were a distinction between the two which reflects the documentation we currently have: is about phones with cameras in, while is more about apps. However, I suspect we're not going to have much luck enforcing that distinction unless "we" (the more active users of the site) re-tag questions as appropriate. That doesn't mean we shouldn't attempt to do it of course.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ I guess I'd rather merge 'em and use tag apps for apps. (Or some other more-clearly-mobile-app-oriented tag like (not yet existing) mobile-apps. \$\endgroup\$
    – mattdm
    Commented Jun 16, 2014 at 3:18
-1
\$\begingroup\$

I'd like more, since it describes the device better, but has the word camera innit. PhotoSE is about cameras, more or less. Then again, there's a camera in just about any mobile phone, but a good deal of photo-applications can only run on smartphones.

I get a feeling, even in 2014, that the next week, if a cameraphone tag gets merged into smartphone, there will come someone complaining over it, saying s/he wanted to ask about the camera of a mobile phone but it ain't no smartphone.

For voting, this answer is in favor of keeping them as they are.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ I personally think that there is still a difference, but we may want to clarify or alter the names of the tags. I think there should be a distinction between phones that can take pictures and software that can be run on a smartphone to work with photos. I'm not sure exactly how we keep that distinction though. Perhaps phone-cameras (as opposed to point-and-shoot or system cameras) and smartphone-software. I'm not sure. \$\endgroup\$
    – AJ Henderson Mod
    Commented Jan 9, 2014 at 18:47
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ The cheapest mobile phone I could possibly find last time I was looking for one still had a camera in it. \$\endgroup\$
    – TRiG
    Commented May 14, 2014 at 14:25
-1
\$\begingroup\$

Since Esa provided a "don't do it", answer, this is the contrary: we should merge these tags.

\$\endgroup\$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .