Timeline for The moderator power of "vote to close"
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2013 at 14:08 | comment | added | AJ Henderson Mod | I think that the definition of clearly is subjective, but needs to go strongly (directly) and objectively against something in the FAQ about what the site is about. If the moderator can't link to something that makes it specifically off topic, then I think it needs to be left up to the community. | |
| Aug 20, 2010 at 11:21 | comment | added | Rowland Shaw Mod | As a caveat on this, if the moderators are to stay out of the closing process, we'll need the help of others to actively flag things for closure when that is the right thing to do; moderation should be about resolving disputes, rather than starting them ;) | |
| Aug 6, 2010 at 5:39 | comment | added | Reid | Perhaps we need to define "clearly" more precisely. | |
| Aug 5, 2010 at 18:52 | comment | added | jrista Mod | Should we take this to the lounge? | |
| Aug 5, 2010 at 14:12 | comment | added | Rowland Shaw Mod | I was going to try and say something like that earlier, but was never happy with the wording. Of course, there is the option of the Teachers' Lounge for this sort of discussion as well... | |
| Aug 5, 2010 at 12:58 | history | answered | chills42Mod | CC BY-SA 2.5 |