Skip to main content

Timeline for Weekly Featured Image: Dec 13 '10

Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5

7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 18, 2010 at 14:40 vote accept Rowland ShawMod
Dec 18, 2010 at 14:40
Dec 12, 2010 at 23:40 comment added Evan Krall +1 for people. We've had enough pictures of static objects lately.
Dec 10, 2010 at 20:39 comment added Rowland Shaw Mod @sebastian.b Wikipedia requires images to be suitable for commercial use though, if I remember correctly.
Dec 7, 2010 at 23:05 comment added sebastien.b I don't see photo.se as "commercial use", the same way another community site like Wikipedia isn't. On the other hand that's one of the reason I posted this one, I think so far we have stayed away from portraits or people, maybe for legal reasons. Said couple was anonymous when I shot them, but they found me online after the pics made the rounds locally. They were really happy with the pic and I sent them the original. I'm pretty confident they would allow us to use it as a banner for a week.
Dec 7, 2010 at 21:21 comment added lindes Hmm, brings up an interesting question in my mind. Does the banner page for this site count as "commercial use"? I wonder if they'd have a publicity rights claim or anything. (I presume you don't have a release, given your statement that they're "Anonymous". I don't know if it matters or not, just raising the question.)
Dec 7, 2010 at 18:45 comment added Rowland Shaw Mod I think I actually prefer it with this aspect ratio - gives a very cinematic feel.
Dec 7, 2010 at 4:51 history answered sebastien.b CC BY-SA 2.5