Timeline for Vocabulary: Generic equivalents of DX and FX tags
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:44 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.photo.stackexchange.com/ with https://photo.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jul 23, 2010 at 14:00 | answer | added | kristof | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 22, 2010 at 10:21 | answer | added | Edd | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 21, 2010 at 18:20 | answer | added | chills42 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 20, 2010 at 7:01 | answer | added | gabr | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jul 19, 2010 at 20:15 | comment | added | Rowland Shaw | Canon has three main sensor sizes, APS-C (most common, and most support the EF-S mount), APS-H (1D only) and full frame (5D/1Ds) | |
| Jul 19, 2010 at 19:31 | comment | added | Reid | Well, in Nikon-speak, DX and FX refer to the sensor size only; both use the F-mount. I think - I could be wrong of course. Don't know about Canon myself. | |
| Jul 19, 2010 at 19:28 | comment | added | esm | This seems conflates two separate issues: sensor crop factor (1x, 1.3x, 1.5x, 1.6x, 2x) and physical lens mount (DX/FX, EF/EF-S, etc). I'm afraid I don't have a good tagging suggestion that would be helpful for both the pedants like me and normal people with more important things to worry about, other than just noting that the concepts seem orthogonal to me. :) | |
| Jul 19, 2010 at 18:18 | history | asked | Reid | CC BY-SA 2.5 |