The question What is the best Canon lens (around $500) for taking pictures of my newborn? The answers fulfill the posters original question OK I think. But for example the top answer recommends the 28mm f/2.8 lens, which in my opinion is not even close to a wide enough aperture for newborn photography.
Maybe the entire difference between how I want to ask this question and how this was previously asked is price. $500 is not even a ballpark figure for what I will spend on a lens. I want to get the best, ignoring price.
Can I ask the exact same question and remove the price barrier?
As a side note, the thread doesn't mention the 35mm f/1.4 L or 24 f/1.4 L, which are two HUGE reasons to even select full frame, and in my opinion may be the BEST newborn lenses available(I could be wrong, that is why I want to ask).