Let's say, theoretically, Joel Spolsky wrote a blog entry about Stack Exchange, and proudly exclaimed that three of the SE sites have a 100% answer rate. Are we one of these?
4 Answers
Perfection is a journey, not a destination
100% today is not 100% tomorrow, so let's keep it up and not rest on our laurels.
I also recommend
http://stackexchange.com/sites?expand=true
If you want to compare your site's stats with other sites in the Stack Exchange network.
Use the "Sort by:" drop-down to change the ranking orders.
Of course, we love all of our virtual children equally.. :)
Yes! Yes we are.
http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2011/01/state-of-the-stack-2010-a-message-from-your-ceo/
Go us!
Actually, no, we do not have a 100% answer rate: there are currently 3 questions with no answer at all.
(Close indeed - 99.8% answer rate - but no cigar.)
-
\$\begingroup\$ Presumably we did when Joel made the chart. :) \$\endgroup\$– mattdmCommented Jan 28, 2011 at 14:28
-
1\$\begingroup\$ Anyway, one of those is a duplicate, one is a borderline-off-topic specific-camera-recommendation question, and the third is recently asked and is kind of... boring. For the first two, vote to close. \$\endgroup\$– mattdmCommented Jan 28, 2011 at 14:38
-
\$\begingroup\$ I don't think we were; currently there's two unanswered and they both predate the blog post by at least a week. Cooking, I'd buy - they have just one unanswered question asked yesterday; English probably not though - just one unanswered question, but asked six days before the post. \$\endgroup\$– ReidCommented Jan 28, 2011 at 23:45
-
\$\begingroup\$ Also, I agree on closing the two remaining unanswered and voted to do so. \$\endgroup\$– ReidCommented Jan 28, 2011 at 23:52
-
\$\begingroup\$ Both the unanswered questions have not been upvoted, so may have been excluded from the calculations. \$\endgroup\$– Rowland Shaw ModCommented Jan 29, 2011 at 15:53