Late Answers queue has > 300 items in it, all seem to be years old. Something like this happened awhile back. I imagine it will go away on its own, but pointing it out in case someone wants to take a look at it.
\$\begingroup\$
\$\endgroup\$
5
-
2\$\begingroup\$ See Jon Ericson's answer on MSE for some background on this. \$\endgroup\$– JNat StaffModCommented Sep 29, 2015 at 20:01
-
4\$\begingroup\$ So...what's going on is that they raised the reputation bar to 50 (i.e., to capture all the answers from folks who can't comment), and now our backlog queue is 300+, and we should plow through it? \$\endgroup\$– inkistaCommented Sep 29, 2015 at 20:44
-
\$\begingroup\$ @inkista Could be ServerFault — queue over there is over 3k. \$\endgroup\$– mattdmCommented Sep 29, 2015 at 21:24
-
\$\begingroup\$ @mattdm Oh, ouch. \$\endgroup\$– inkistaCommented Sep 29, 2015 at 22:02
-
1\$\begingroup\$ Related: jericson.github.io/2015/10/11/late_answers.html \$\endgroup\$– dpollittCommented Oct 21, 2015 at 2:02
Add a comment
|
1 Answer
\$\begingroup\$
\$\endgroup\$
4
-
2\$\begingroup\$ Aww... we can only 20 at a time... :D \$\endgroup\$– inkistaCommented Sep 29, 2015 at 22:02
-
\$\begingroup\$ And I'm now getting complained at by the system for not having voted on questions :-) \$\endgroup\$– Philip Kendall ModCommented Sep 30, 2015 at 9:48
-
1\$\begingroup\$ Ugh, this seems to have resulted in several people going through and clicking "No action needed!" on most of the queue, which is unfortunate, because a lot of those could have used some improvement. \$\endgroup\$– mattdmCommented Oct 1, 2015 at 2:28
-
\$\begingroup\$ Not actually taking time to really review is a good way for some to encounter a review ban... \$\endgroup\$– Joanne C ModCommented Oct 1, 2015 at 23:33