This question is most likely going to be marked as a dupe of this question.
While I agree that the two are very similar, the answer of the older Q doesn't involve any advice for film shooters when discussing ISO.
Film was outside of the parameters of the original question - but if these two Q's are really duplicates, then the film advice is warranted in the answer of the older Q. Would it be wrong to edit the older answer with additional info, especially in cases where that info may have been outside of the original q's scope?